Bitinstant to bitcoin address 2013 honda civic
4 stars based on
54 reviews
As defined in BIP 44, wallet api will not scan past 20 unused addresses. People problem not be aware, they will not test for this. Setting the behaviour to 'KEEP' will send additional notifications every blockchain a transaction with the specified confirmations and operation type is sent to or from the address in the request.
Api not blockchain familiar with the service that the OP is using, but Blockchain. Sign up using Facebook. Payment was problem and confirmed. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. They could, but since the client side web implementation is open source, if they attempted anything like that. Use the xpub you want to check and your API key like so:.
Their API keeps on failing on me too. You should create a new account inside your wallet exclusively for transactions facilitated by this API. Here we go https: People will not be aware, they will not test for this. Bitcoin Stack Api is a question and answer site problem Bitcoin crypto-currency enthusiasts. Stack Api works best with JavaScript enabled. There is 2 solutions: I appreciate your generosity, but I don't mind paying problem own fees especially when it increases reliability.
Hope will get it done. Unlike traditional currencies blockchain as dollars, bitcoins are issued and managed without any central blockchain whatsoever: Ebay doesn't sell anything. I'm pretty sure that BlockChain. They either need to fix the node or add in some logic to prevent building a house of cards of transactions that could result in a lot of people's money being in the wrong places.
I appreciate your generosity, but I don't mind paying my own fees especially when it increases reliability. This is just another "service" where you give up ownership of coins to some shady company. I'd recommend to develop a local alternative not too hard to implement this stuff actually, you just poll a bitcoind server, depending on your use case you could even get away with just looking at incoming blocksmaybe you will open source it too?
This is a great find, thank you! I am actually building my own polling platform to work with not just bitcoin, but dozens of alt-coins too. I like redundancy for any infrastructure project. For the bitcoin nodes, I was going to start with 2 bitcoind nodes, 2 btcd nodes, and two servers that can proxy address lookups to public block explorer websites as an emergency failsafe.
Having an additional bitcoin node technology obelisk lets me add even more redundancy. I'll just have to make sure I rotate through the different servers during every 30 second poll and put in some checks to give me a heads up if there are ever any transactions that bitcoind understands but obelisk doesn't.
The bitcoin protocol changes from time to time and I want to make sure that obelisk changes with it. They have no knowledge of my private key and I have a copy of my keys backed up.
I never gave up ownership of my coins to use their wallet. I'm not to familiar with the service that the OP is using, but Blockchain. OP does not use their wallet service. The one that is the topic here requires someone to send BTC to blockchain. You sure they couldn't just modify the code to slip your private key right through? I guess they might be able to get away with something sneaky like giving different code to one out of every thousand costumers, so yeah, there is a small amount of trust there.
I trust that they don't want or have my keys in the first place and I trust in the open source model to make any attempts to circumvent that known.
I ask because it seems some of they're key employees, are active and highly evangelist contributors to the bitcoin space. There were several cases where they changed the JavaScript code of their webwallet before actually releasing it on Github.
They do not have any kind of legal disclosure who actually runs or operates the site. You speak of key employees - do you actually have any kind of list of employees there? While I'm not personally bothered that they're not posting there code to github right away, I can understand the communities concern.
I'm sure you mean the Bitcoin block chainand not the Blockchain. Maybe you're more correct, but I've definitely seen it being referred to as "blockchain" more often.
Nonetheless, I'll probably start using "block chain" from now on, as I remember. It was always block chain until blockchain. Using the space makes the block chain differentiable from blockchain. Yes of course, and in fact that is another thing i don't like about Blockchain. It's like Microsoft calling their browser 'Internet Explorer'. Like the fact they have this dubious site: Yes and how they bullshitted their way through the nonsense with their iphone app. They lied about what they did and got caught out, end of story.
But because it's a bitcoin company they are angels. Caught out lying and deceiving customers with false advertising, but because they take bitcoins cheap gimmick to pull them out of the red they are hailed as heroes of the free world. Even the ruling mentions that the price the customers paid were at or below the competitors price, so it's not like they were deceived into paying more. They just got "cheated" into feeling they got a better deal than they did. Anyone ever seen an item at a big box store that actually sells for the MSRP?
No, because that's a made up price too. While this type of marketing is probably a bit over some line, anyone who follows the general advice of "buyer beware" and shops around just a little won't be taken advantage of by this. If, for example, ebay had been caught doing this somehow I'm using ebay as its frequently touted as anti bitcoin this subreddit would shit its pants in anger.
Infact I bet there ARE a number of listing that have the same type of inflation. Ever watch and infomercial? This shit is everywhere. Are you saying that consumers are so generally stupid that we even have to regulate the price they don't pay? Insulating the consumer from scrutinizing the value of their purchases just puts them at ease, ripe to be taken advantage of by ought right fraudsters.
I'll update this with a link when I get a chance, but basically they put the app on the market with a totally different description and use case to what they then updated it to.
Totally went against Apple policy and Apple were well within their rights to ban it. Now many people argue that they only lied to get the wallet on there in the first place, but 2 wrongs don't make a right imo. I wanted to let you know that we are looking into this issue.
You can do this here or in a new Zendesk ticket just mention this post. If you opened multiple new tickets, then they may have all been merged into one. Just let me know. Take a look at the bitcoinj library. One of the examples shows how to build your own forwarding service.
How does Blockchain the company has any control over whether miners broadcast your transactions or not? An unconfirmed transaction means Blockchain has already posted to the bitcoin network. From there, miners can confirm it or not. Miners usually prioritize over transactions with higher fees, obviously.
Learn about how bitcoins work before blaming a company, thats providing a valuable service in the industry, all for FREE.
If you read the post in detail, you'll see that I'm using a service that blockchain. They tell me a deposit address that they generate and have the private keys for. I instruct my customers to make a deposit to that address.
It's the miners fee that they added that was unconfirmed and likely won't confirm because it's from a malformed transaction on an orphaned block. Since it's bundled with the payment that's supposed to be forwarded to me, I fear that I'll never receive the funds. Don't worry, I don't think Blockchain will swallow the 0.
The blockchain receive payments API takes care of the generation and monitoring of addresses. We will notify your server using a simple callback whenever a payment is received. The easiest way to start receiving payments is to open a Blockchain Wallet at https: This method creates a unique address which should be presented to the customer.
For any payments sent to this address, you will be sent an HTTP notification. This is done so you do not show the same address to two different customers. However, all funds will still show within the same account.
As defined in BIP 44, wallet software will not scan past 20 unused addresses. Given enough requests from this API that don't have a matching payment, you could generate addresses past this horizon, which would make spending funds paid to those addresses quite difficult.
For this reason, this API will return an error and refuse to generate new addresses if it detects it would create a gap of over 20 unused addresses. If you encounter this error, you will either need to switch to a new xPub within the same wallet is fineor receive a payment to one of the previous 20 created addresses.
