How is international business affected by us trade laws who do these laws protect do you think they
It appears, however, that the qualifications must be made a condition of the contract itself. Any legislative action will be narrowly focused and crafted to preserve the ability of legitimate plaintiffs to assert their patent rights. In the meantime, employers should continue to comply with the law as it has been written. He sits on the boards of several international organizations and academic journals. The correct reading of the GATT text would permit a country to impose conditions on imports related to the labour practices involved in their production.
It is anomalous and unjustifiable that WTO regulations should force a country to provide better treatment to foreign bidders than to domestic enterprises, prohibiting it from imposing on the former human rights-based requirements that it routinely imposes on the latter. Moreover, the failure to abide by these new rules--and indeed the old rules as well--as interpreted in dispute settlement triggers a right to retaliation against the offending party, with the level of retaliation subject to determination by arbitration. At the same time, globalization has served to focus heightened attention on such practices in general, including abuses that existed before globalization but were often ignored.
When properly interpreted and applied, the trade regime recognizes that human rights are fundamental and prior to free trade itself. At the end of Januarya new initiative of the United Nations was inaugurated -- the Global Compact -- to link businesses, citizens and certain international agencies in a dialogue concerning labour issues, environmental protection and human rights. The text of the GATT does not, however, explicitly list human rights as grounds for the exclusion of products. The Appellate Body adopted an interpretation that included endangered species within the meaning of the expression, which is found in a provision of the GATT that allows members to take trade action otherwise not consistent with GATT obligations where the measures are taken in relation to the conservation of such resources.