2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots

Ethics and Nanotechnology

5 stars based on 43 reviews

Vani Hari, is rapidly making a name for herself not in a good way to rival Mike Adams for sheer pseudoscience. My not-so-secret hope is that one day, Mike Adams and the Food Babe will go after each other, the way Mike Adams has gone after his competitors by doing mass spectroscopy on their supplements and trumpeting the results that show elevated levels of heavy metal and the Food Babe quackmails food companies. In the meantime, did you know that this latest Ebola outbreak in Africa is likely a hoax to trick you into getting a viral nanobot-laced vaccine that will destroy you?

I realize that Ebola is serious businessbut unfortunately serious business often brings 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots serious quackery and conspiracy theories, and I have a week spot deep in my Tarial-cell fueled heart or whatever passes for a heart in an awesome computer.

What will happen if you end up with these things inside you? With only K of super efficient DNA code, viral nanobots were released into the wild via vaccinations on September 22 and are being peddled as a natural variant of the T4 bacteriophage. Thus endeth the lesson. I do, however, love the 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots of this conspiracy. Click the image to the left to see how I proved it, this is NOT a hoax. So that is the time frame this little six pointed demon was released into the wild.

Well, actually, I can. I remember seeing electron micrographs of T4 phages that had six legs back in the s, when I was a graduate student actually growing up T4 phages to screen phage libraries. For instance, this paper shows an illustration of the six-legged structure, and so does this paperbut obviously these could be faked, right? Indeed, our intrepid conspiracy theorist is insisting on only printed images from journals before to demonstrate that this six-legged structure was demonstrated a long time ago.

To provide a background on this, I have a really close friend who is a doctorate of pharmacology and an expert in the related microbiology fields. While having lengthy discussions about the future of weaponized medicine, this friend went on and on about how bacteriophages were being re engineered to attack our 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots cells rather than their normal host — bacteria, implant DNA directly into our 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots to change us immediately and forever change future generations by delivering a DNA payload to the egg cells in the ovaries and also to the male reproductive system.

This would have a permanent impact on the future of mankind. Once this type of phage was received 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots a vaccination, those vaccinated would have the vaccine induced traits passed along via DNA insertion by the phage to all future generations.

Though phages which are viruses that 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots bacteria, of various types have been around virtually forever, they have thus far been harmless 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots anything other than bacteria, and are even highly selective in the exact type and species of bacteria they will attack.

When discussing this topic, I raised the question WHY were they modifying phages instead of common viruses that have a history of attacking people. One answer is in the fact that phages, more so than ordinary viruses which can cross the species divide, are highly selective in their targets and are programmed to only attack precisely what they were designed to — a bacteriophage will prefer only one variant of a particular type of bacteria.

For 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots, there are many different types of salmonella bacteria, and among salmonella bacteria, a particular phage will attack only one variant while leaving other variants of salmonella alone. In the brain, not all neurons are identical, but all are similar so when administered via an intentionally tainted vaccine, the high selectivity of a modified bacteriophage can be used to target precisely the type of neuron a sabotaged 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots would be intended to wipe out.

This is just silly. The T4 phage enters E. It acts as an immunomodulator and contributes to the symptoms of sepsis. So the whole tail assembly would have to be reengineered to bind to specific human proteins and to contain genetic material that could replicate in humans.

Remember, bacteria have a very different machinery for protein synthesis and DNA replication than eucaryotic cells. But, then, what do I know? You know what else is a conspiracy? In fact, between those two dates the conspiracy not only invented 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots and cheeseburgers, they invented cat macros, too.

Well, there is one such monster in the flash game Mardek RPG. Guess it was a documentary. I believe bacteriophage pictures have become increasingly familiar outside of microbiology-related fields in the past decade. What else has six points? Stone did not attempt to bring the Bavarian Illuminati into the conspiracy. Stone seems not to have heard.

They have invented 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots tool called Photoshop. You can get the Gardasil vaccine and still participate in the running of the bulls. I too am old and quaint. As an undergrad I created and screened a genomic library contained in bacteriophage. And then, I got to sequence parts of it using long gel, radioactive nucleotide sequencing.

I wish I had kept some of those films to show people what we used to do in the old days as we walked up hill both ways. That takes reptiloid rancor. So, 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots B, please do what you can to quash this unpleasantness. Yours in Pharma Eeeeevil. I can never remember.

Snow kills people every winter — but not in Israel. Obviously snow has been weaponized to kill … the rest of us. Whether the human race will be alright is another question. Desperate people do desperate things. None of these tools for exterminating large parts of the human race, like vaccines, chemtrails, and GMO rice, seem to work very well.

I think the evil geniouses need to up their game. I am always amazed at the new levels of creativity that can be attained by crackpots. Fighter jets are fakes. Hey, at least that guy tries to explain albeit in misguided fashion why NASA would go to the trouble of faking the Moon landings.

Back in the s I ran into a couple of doozies. One of them was the one and only Archimedes Plutonium he was calling himself Ludwig von Ludwig when I first encountered himwho insists that the universe is an electron in a plutonium atom. There was another guy on Usenet who insisted that energy is not a conserved quantity, but decays with time of course, he made no attempt to produce any testable predictions of his theory. The video damn near killed me, GM mosquitoes are meant to inject vaccines into you?!

I thought they reproduced to form fewer females. The way he divides everything black and white. Oh, there was a net kook. I never bumped into him, but I did encounter Robert E McElwaine on one occasion when I was moderating a message board.

He 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots did a hit-and-run on us. As far as Apollo hoaxers, most of 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots say that NASA faked it because it was too important to beat the Russians, so when they discovered they lacked the resources to actually do it, they faked it instead.

Unexplained is why the Russians would then go along with it…. Another faction claims that NASA faked it to either cover up a military mission to the Moon or to cover up the presence of aliens on the Moon. Why would anyone want to go to the trouble to genetically 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots mosquitoes to deliver vaccines for population control.

And tsetse flies will happily deliver one well known to mess with your brain. Gotta go detox my computer to get Jones remnants out. Or maybe, on the homeopathic principle of like-cures-like, find a very large bull, give it a coffee enema, and dump my computer in a tub of the result.

Jews have controlled the Vatican since the midth century. The Jesuits aligned with the Illuminati to take over the Freemasons according to a Talmudic design. Of course global warming is theirs too. They have to fight it because it impairs the efficiency of their snowflakes as a population-reduction tool. Calli 35 — To me, the single most conclusive proof that people really landed on the moon is the physical and isoltopic composition of moon rocks.

Faking such things would be far more difficult than simply going ahead and putting men on the moon. Chris — I actually know the guy who came up with the Big Rip idea. No doubt at the same time other entities have been working on the same technology for opposing and other reasons. The method of delivery of such a virus is known to be aerial dispersion, and the biological delivery method… a nano phage based on the T4 bacteriophage.

It is public knowledge that a nanotech T4 bacteriaphage has been created, albeit 10 times larger than the naturally occuring phage. Dumbfounded by the recent happenings to Malaysia Air planes?

I can help… many governments have known since before the MH disappearance that a nano-virus has been released out into the wild… but this ones goal is to create religious fanatacism. And the rest of the worlds leaders are shit scared. After getting everything they could from these experts the US realised that they also need virus experts… hence why MH17 came to the demise that it did, but not before the virus experts, on their way to an AIDS conference in 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots Australia were removed from the flight and also taken to Diego Garciawhich by the way has been extremely heavily miltary guarded since a week before the MH flight.

They are currently working on a way to fight the nano virus that is now loose in the world. I never heard of it until this morning, but apparently there really are people who believe in a anti-religion vaccine. The tie-in with the Malaysian airliner and 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots deaths of all those AIDS experts is 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots more recent, of course.

If you do that, there will be much trouble. Serious ecologists will assume you mean it more-or-less literally, 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots dismiss it as bunk. A large crop of kooks will also 2006 challenge kid nano nanorobots you mean it literally, and will start getting all devotional and worshipful, which will make the rest of the scientists hold their noses and run.

Instead, come up with a dull boring name for it: Even the acronym is dull. What could be more conspiratorially than a plot to unravel all matter in our universe. They claim the rocks were collected and returned by robots. Why we still struggle to do such a thing today and why definitively robotic missions returned miniscule quantities by comparison is not ever explained, of course.

No Poe… and by the way. It looked like everybody there was laughing themselves sick that anyone could believe that.

Bitcoin bot gratis 2018usb bitcoin miner 336 mhsp

Blockchain payment gateway
Bitcoin mining gui nang

The 1 bitcoin show with adam meistermonerov is doing it right while fluffy pony is not bitmain ether

Reflections beauty salon exmouth market

Anx bitcoin card game
Bitcoin gold mining rig for sale
Dogecoin nascar design engineering

Ethereum blog dao

28 comments

Litecoin gpu miner amd sempron

This patent application claims priority to U. Provisional Patent Application Ser. This invention generally relates to the field of exploring underground rock and hydrocarbon formations.

In particular, the present invention is directed to a method and apparatus for using nanorobots to move through a subsurface formation to identify various geophysical characteristics.

The overriding problem in exploring for hydrocarbons in the subsurface is the probing in, and characterizing of, an environment that cannot be seen. Similarly once a commercial hydrocarbon deposit has been discovered and is about to be developed and exploited much conjecture and many assumptions must be made by reservoir geologists and reservoir engineers in the modeling of a large volume of rock which cannot be seen. Subsurface reservoir data is currently acquired from probes lowered into boreholes and from images seismography.

In the first instance, the data is handicapped by its insufficiency, by virtue of being sourced from a single 6-inch hole, thus giving too narrow of a view. The interpreted seismic volumes, on the other hand, gives too broad of a view due to their imaging quality and resolution inadequacies.

Even combining the two, will not enable for the mapping of exact high permeability pathways. The integration of available geological, geophysical, petrophysical engineering, and drilling data makes interesting inroads into the detection, mapping and predictive modeling of high permeability pathways. The final uncertainty of integrated models, however, can only be marginally better than the average uncertainty inherent in the various methods used.

Mix and integrate as much as one may, the broad brush strokes on reservoir map deliverables, will remain just that: The scribble will not reveal the precise path that the fluids are likely to take.

As oil fields mature, it can be expected that fluid injection for pressure support secondary enhanced oil recovery will increasingly tend to erratically invade, and irregularly sweep, the residual oil leg. At the close of the second millennium, petroleum concerns were seen scrambling to mobilize however possible in order to identify, detect and map pathways that may lead injected fluids prematurely updip along encroachment fingers.

More often than not, the encroachment materializes faster than even the worst expectations, and commonly in quite unpredictable directions. Moreover, premature encroachment is commonly tortuous and will change direction in 3D volume, much like a rubber ball wildly bounced about in a cubic enclosure. This type of tortuousity renders high permeability pathway prediction almost impossible to satisfactorily pin down.

In spite of an arsenal of cutting-edge technologies thrown at such problems, high permeability pathway prediction capability continues to suffer from high levels of uncertainty.

Post mortem and predictive mapping of erratically occurring high permeability pathways is a leading issue of concern to major petroleum companies. Permeability pathways are interwell phenomena. Unfortunately, it is interwell control that is very difficult to characterize. With current technology, it is impossible to work out the exact pathway that fluid fingering takes as it invades deep into an oil leg, much less where it will go next.

The resultant maps are a very indirect, unreliable and a crude way of trying to depict the reservoir geology of a reservoir. The resultant maps are interpretive, and reservoir engineers are the first to dissociate them from being accurate reflections of specific geologic features. Moreover, the map resolutions are too broad to even remotely represent most geological features that would commonly be associated with high permeability pathways.

Other interwell methods to map permeability pathways are, likewise, handicapped by resolution problems. Geophysical technologies rooted in interpreting 3D, 4D, shear wave, or multi-component volumes; even when utilizing ever-developing clarity and resolution enhancing software packages, still only render a generalized mapping of a miniscule sampling of some faults in the general area where they may or may not be located. In carbonate rocks, fractures with apertures measured in millimeters, or geobodies only centimeters across, can provide the necessary plumbing to take injected fluid past matrixed oil.

To further illustrate this, a 3 cm wide fracture with no displacement may, under pressure, move fluids at several Darcies. These dimensions cannot be seen by current interpretive geophysical devices. Subsequently, the fault lines drawn on reservoir structure maps cannot be considered more than broad arrows pointing out a general direction; and not a depiction of actual permeability pathways.

Furthermore, geophysically-interpreted data must be augmented by a solid understanding of the regional stress-strain regimes in order to filter out fracture swarms which may not be contributing to premature fluid breakthroughs. Dyes and radioactive chemicals tracers introduced with injected fluids can be locally helpful, but they will not reveal the actual pathway taken by the host fluid from the entry well to the detection well.

Borehole detection methods are the most exact, but they are also afflicted with major shortcomings. The immediately obvious shortcoming is that, for mapping purposes, wellsite data must be extrapolated and transformed into interwell information. Extrapolation in itself is the problem. Any sedimentologist will sympathize with the deposition heterogeneities with or without a structural overprint. The slightest shifts in water depth, measured in decimeters, can create worlds of difference in depositional fabric.

There is no carbonate porosity that has not been dictated by deposition and then unceasingly altered by diagenesis. One can already see the problem of interwell extrapolation from well control. The geostatistical distribution of attributes, including fractures detected on borehole image logs, at the wellbore, is the best we've got; but it is only statistical, and natural geological landscapes are too variable and rugose to respond comfortably to the smooth, clean logic of mathematics.

Much like fingerprints, there are no two features in carbonate rocks that are the same. Extrapolation in the complex world of carbonate geology has a long way to go. Adding to the difficulties of borehole solutions is that the geological features contributing to abnormally high flow rates are, like some rare species, rarely captured in rock cores.

Consequently reservoir geologists are, in most cases, disallowed the opportunity to properly study and characterize reservoir problems. A geophysical formation can include large rock formations.

The rock formations are not solid like metals , rather, they are a series of interconnected pores and pathways. Many of these pores and pathways are less than nanometers wide. The pores can contain a variety of fluids including oil, water, or natural gas. It is desirable to know the contents and the structure of the pores. It is also important to understand the structures that permit high speed fluid flow through the formation.

Due to the depth of hydrocarbon bearing formations, often several thousand feet below ground, it is difficult to map a series of microscopic pores.

Conventional devices for determining the contents of the formation, as shown in FIG. One such method is surface seismic analysis, in which loud noises such as explosive charges are created near the surface, and an array of acoustic receivers 20 measure and record the reflected sound. Similarly, acoustic receivers 22 can be lowered into a wellbore to record reflected sound. Neither of these seismic methods provide any detail about the pore structure nor the specific locations of the pores.

Another method is to drill a wellbore and remove core samples from the area drilled. The core samples are only a few inches wide and do not reveal the pathway structure for the entire geophysical formation. A nanoscale robot, with a dimension smaller than nanometers, could move through the pores to map the pore and pathway structure, find hydrocarbons within the structure, find water within the structure, and analyze the fluids, minerals, and rocks within the structure.

One embodiment of a system to measure properties in a geophysical includes a wellbore lining in a wellbore, a plurality of fixed radio frequency receivers spaced apart along the longitudinal extent of and associated with the wellbore lining to receive radio frequency transmissions at one or more preselected radio frequencies, and a plurality of independent and untethered robots positioned within the geophysical formation.

Each of the plurality of independent and untethered robots includes a robot body formed of a plurality of carbon nanotubes adapted to withstand temperatures exceeding degrees Fahrenheit and being sized so that none of the length, width, or height of the robot body is greater than nanometers, a sensor associated with the robot body and positioned to detect the presence of one or more hydrocarbons within the geophysical formation, a radio frequency transmitter associated with the robot body, positioned to transmit positional data and hydrocarbon characteristic data from the geophysical formation when the robot is positioned therein, and a power supply associated with the robot body to supply power to the transmitter and the sensor.

These parts of the independent and untethered robot can collectively define a geophysical nanorobots.

In this embodiment, the system also includes a machine in communication with each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots, the machine including a processor, a display in communication with the processor, and a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium with an executable program stored therein, wherein the program instructs the processor to perform the following steps: In another embodiment, the system includes a molecular processor associated with the robot body and responsive to the sensor to process detected hydrocarbon data from the sensor, and the radio frequency transmitter associated with the robot body is responsive to the molecular processor and positioned to transmit hydrocarbon characteristic data to one or more of the plurality of fixed radiofrequency receivers.

In another embodiment, the system includes a geophysical nanorobot carrier adapted to carry and transport the plurality of geophysical nanorobots into the wellbore when positioned adjacent thereto, the geophysical nanorobot carrier being a wellbore lining having a plurality of perforations therein through which the plurality of geophysical robots pass when being inserted into the geophysical formation.

In another embodiment, at least one of the fixed radio frequency receivers is positioned to receive data from at least another one of the fixed radio frequency receivers when positioned in the geophysical formation and re-transmit the data from the at least another one of the fixed radio frequency receivers to the machine.

In another embodiment, each of the nanorobots also includes a propulsion device associated with each of the robot bodies to propel each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots through pathways within the geophysical formation. Another embodiment includes a plurality of fixed radio transmitters associated with the wellbore lining. Each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots also includes a payload bay having a payload; and the geophysical nanorobot is positioned to release the payload in response to a signal from one of the plurality of fixed radio transmitters.

In another embodiment, the propulsion device of each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots can include one or more of the following: In another embodiment, the power supply of each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots can derive energy from a fluid within the geophysical formation.

In yet another embodiment, the power supply of each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots can include one or more of the following: In another embodiment, the sensor can of each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots can sense one or more of the following: Another embodiment includes a plurality of fixed radio transmitters associated with the wellbore lining and each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots also includes a nanorobot radio frequency receiver associated therewith; and one or more of the plurality of nanorobots propels in a direction different than a current trajectory in response to instructions from the machine transmitted via the plurality of fixed radio transmitters.

Another embodiment includes a battery charger associated with the wellbore lining which defines a downhole charging station; and each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots also includes a carbon nanotube based battery located in the robot body. Each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots can propel to the proximity of the downhole charging station and the downhole charging station charges each of the carbon nanotube based batteries.

Another embodiment includes a plurality of radio directional transmitters associated with the wellbore lining, each transmitting a beacon therefrom, wherein each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots also includes a nanorobot radio frequency receiver, and wherein each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots determines its position in response to signals from the plurality of radio direction beacons. In another embodiment, each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots also includes a nanorobot radio frequency receiver, wherein one or more of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots is positioned to receive positional data from at least another one of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots and re-transmit the positional data from the at least another one of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots.

In another embodiment, the surface location data includes the location of a point wherein one of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots contacted a surface within the geophysical formation. In another embodiment, the surface location data includes multiple location points from non-contact sensors. In another embodiment, the non-contact sensors include an ultrasonic sensor or a radio frequency sensor, or both, located on the geophysical nanorobots.

In another embodiment, the program further instructs the processor to perform the step of interpolating fluid data to identify a three-dimensional region filled with a homogenous fluid to define a fluid pocket within the geophysical formation. In another embodiment, the program also instructs the processor to perform the step of identifying a plurality of cavities in communication with one another, each cavity having a cross-sectional area greater than a predetermined value, to define a pathway.

In another embodiment, the program also instructs the processor to perform the step of identifying a pocket having a homogenous hydrocarbon that is generally surrounded by a fluid that is different than the homogenous hydrocarbon to define a hydrocarbon pocket within the geophysical formation.

In another embodiment, the program also instructs the processor to perform the step of causing at least one of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots to move to a location different than its current location. One embodiment of a technique to identify properties of a geophysical formation includes steps of: In another embodiment, the technique includes interpolating, by the machine, the fluid data to identify a three-dimensional region filled with a homogenous fluid to define a fluid pocket within the geophysical formation.

In another embodiment, the technique includes identifying, by the machine, a plurality of cavities in communication with one another, each cavity having a cross-sectional area greater than a predetermined value, to define a pathway. In another embodiment of the technique, the plurality of geophysical robots include a nanorobot defined as having: In another embodiment, the communicating step of the technique includes transmitting, via a radio frequency transmitter associated with the robot body, to a fixed radio frequency receiver located in a wellbore.

In another embodiment, the communicating step of the technique includes transmitting data, via a fixed radio frequency transmitter associated with a wellbore, to a fixed radio frequency receiver associated with the wellbore and further communicating the data to the machine. In another embodiment, a system to measure properties in a geophysical formation includes a plurality of wellbore linings each being positioned in a separate and different one of a plurality of wellbores extending into a geophysical formation.

It also includes a plurality of fixed radio frequency transmitters spaced apart along the longitudinal extent of and associated with one or more of the plurality of wellbore linings to transmit radio frequency signals at one or more preselected radio frequencies and a plurality of independent and untethered robots positioned within the geophysical formation.

Each of the plurality of independent and untethered robots can include a robot body having a diameter no greater than nanometers, formed of a plurality of carbon nanotubes adapted to withstand temperatures exceeding degrees Fahrenheit, and a radio frequency identification tag positioned to transmit a signal responsive to the one or more preselected radio frequency signal transmitted by one or more of the plurality of fixed transmitters.

Thus, the plurality of independent and untethered robots can collectively define a plurality of geophysical nanorobots. The system can also include a plurality of fixed radio frequency receivers positioned spaced apart along the longitudinal extent of and associated with one or more of the plurality of wellbore linings to receive radio frequency signals at one or more preselected radio frequencies, a machine in communication with each of the plurality of geophysical nanorobots, the machine including a processor, a display in communication with the processor, and a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium with an executable program stored therein.

The program product can instruct the processor to perform the following steps:

desukedo.biz