Blockchain Conference Moscow – what crypto experts will talk about
4 stars based on
39 reviews
Announcing World Trade Francs: The Official Ethereum Stablecoin 01st April, Ethereum scalability research and development subsidy programs 02nd January, One of the criticisms that many people have made about the current direction of the cryptocurrency space is the increasing amount of fragmentation that we are seeing.
There are a number of developers and researchers who are either working for Ethereum or working on ideas as volunteers and happen to spend lots of time interacting with the Ethereum community, and this set of people has coalesced into a group dedicated to building out our particular vision.
Another quasi-decentralized collective, Bitshareshas set their hearts on their own vision, combining their particular combination of DPOS, market-pegged assets and vision of blockchain as decentralized autonomous corporation as a way of reaching their political goals of free-market libertarianism and a contract free society.
As Fabian Brian Crane summarizes:. One recent event that has further inflamed the discussion is the publication of the sidechains proposal. The idea of sidechains is to allow the trustless innovation of altcoins while offering them the same monetary base, liquidity and mining power of the Bitcoin network.
For the proponents, this represents a crucial effort to rally the cryptocurrency ecosystem behind its most successful project and to build on the infrastructure and ecosystem already in place, instead of dispersing efforts in a hundred different directions. If Bitcoin is not powerful enough to be a viable backbone for life, the crypto universe and everything, then why not build a better and more scalable decentralized computer instead and build everything on that?
If there truly is one consensus mechanism that is best, why should we not have a bitcoin garden not giving away eth merger between the various projects, come up with the best kind of decentralized computer to push forward as a basis for the crypto-economy, and move forward together under one unified system?
Why has fragmentation been happening, and why should we continue to let it happen? To the first question, and also simultaneously to the second, the answer is simple: Particularly, consider some of the following claims, all of which I believe in, but which are in many cases a substantial departure from the philosophies of many other people and projects:.
There are probably very few people who agree with me on every single one of the items above. And it is not just myself that has my own peculiar opinions. What is needed is to replace trusted entities with systems of cryptographic proof. Meanwile, certain others feel the need to say things like this:. Put differently, commercially viable reduced-trust networks do not need to protect the world from platform operators.
Bitcoin garden not giving away eth course, if you see the primary benefit of cryptocurrency as being regulation avoidance then that second quote also makes sense, but in a way completely different from the way bitcoin garden not giving away eth original author intended — but that once again only serves to show just how differently people think. Some people see cryptocurrency as a capitalist revolution, others see it as an egalitarian revolution, and others see everything in between.
Some see human bitcoin garden not giving away eth as a very fragile and corruptible thing and cryptocurrency as a beacon of light that can replace it with hard math; others see cryptocurrency consensus as being only an extension of human consensus, made more efficient with technology.
Some consider the best way to achieve cryptoassets with dollar parity to be dual-coin financial bitcoin garden not giving away eth schemes ; others see the simpler approach as being to use blockchains to represent claims bitcoin garden not giving away eth real-world assets instead and still others think that Bitcoin will eventually be more stable than the dollar all on its own. Of course, many of these issues are inherently political, and some involve public goods; in those cases, live and let live is not always a viable solution.
In some cases, the differences are related to private goods, and are primarily simply a matter of empirical beliefs.
If I believe that SchellingDollar is the best scheme for price stability, and others prefer Seignorage Shares or NuBits then after a few years or decades one model will prove to work better, replace its competition, and that will be that.
In other cases, however, the differences will be resolved in a different way: As a number of commentators have pointed out, for decentralized consensus applications in the mainstream financial world, banks will likely not be willing to accept a network managed by anonymous nodes; in this case, something like Ripple will be more useful. But for Silk Road 4. If users want networks specialized to performing specific functions highly efficiently, then networks will exist for that, and if users want a general purpose network with a high network effect between on-chain applications then that will exist as well.
As David Johnston points out, blockchains are like programming languages: However, as was mentioned earlier, this does not mean that we should simply go our own way and try to ignore — or worse, actively sabotage, each other. Even if all of our projects are necessarily specializing toward different goals, there is nevertheless a substantial opportunity for much less duplication bitcoin garden not giving away eth effort, and more cooperation. This is true on multiple levels.
First, let us look at a model of the cryptocurrency ecosystem — or, perhaps, a vision of what it might look like in years time:. Now, consider a few other projects that are trying to build holistic ecosystems of some kind. Bitshares has at the least:.
BitTorrent has announced their plans for Maelstroma project intended to serve a rather similar function to Mist, albeit showcasing their own not blockchain-based technology.
Cryptocurrency projects generally all build a blockchain, a currency and a client of their own, although forking a single client is common for the less innovative cases. Name registration and identity management systems are now a dime a dozen.
And, of course, just about every project realizes that it has a need for some kind of reputation and web of trust. Now, let us paint a picture of an alternative world. Instead of having a collection of cleanly disjoint vertically integrated ecosystems, with each one building its own components for everything, imagine a world where Mist could be used to access Ethereum, Bitshares, Maidsafe or any other major decentralized infrastructure network, with new decentralized networks being installable much like the plugins for Flash and Java inside of Chrome and Firefox.
Imagine that the reputation data in the web of trust for Ethereum could be reused in other projects as well. Imagine StorJ running inside of Maelstrom as a dapp, using Maidsafe for a file storage backend, and using the Ethereum blockchain to maintain the contracts that incentivize continued storage and downloading.
Imagine identities being automatically transferrable across any crypto-networks, as long as they use the same underlying cryptographic algorithms eg. The key insight here is this: Browsers are perhaps the most separable component; most reasonably holistic lower level blockchain service sets have similar needs in terms of what applications can run on them, and so it makes sense for each browser to support each platform. Off-chain services are also a target for abstraction; any decentralized application, regardless of what blockchain technology it uses, should be free to use Whisper, Swarm, IPFS or any other service that developers come up with.
On-chain services, like bitcoin garden not giving away eth provision, can theoretically be built so as to interact with multiple chains.
Additionally, there are plenty of opportunities to collaborate on fundamental research and development. Basic algorithms and best practices related to networking layers, cryptographic algorithm implementations bitcoin garden not giving away eth other low-level components can, and should, be shared.
Interoperability technologies should be developed to facilitate easy exchange and interaction between services and decentralized entities on one platform and another. The Cryptocurrency Research Group is one initiative bitcoin garden not giving away eth we plan to initially support, with the hope that it will grow to flourish independently of ourselves, with the goal of promoting this kind of cooperation.
Other formal and informal institutions can doubtlessly help support the process. Hopefully, in the future we will see many more projects existing in a much more modular fashion, living on only one or two layers of the cryptocurrency ecosystem and providing a common interface allowing any mechanism on any other layer to work bitcoin garden not giving away eth them.
If the cryptocurrency space goes far enough, then even Firefox and Chrome may end up adapting themselves to process decentralized application protocols as well. A journey toward such an ecosystem is not something that needs to be rushed immediately; at this point, we have quite little idea of what kinds of blockchain-driven services people will be using in the first place, making it hard to determine exactly what kind of interoperability would actually be useful.
There is room for many projects that are currently in the crypto 2. All that we need to do right now to set off the journey on a better road is to live with the assumption that we are all building our own platforms, tuned to our own particular set of preferences and parameters, but at the end of the day a plurality of networks will succeed and we will need to live with that reality, so might as well start preparing for it now.
I believe what Preston means to say is: As much as I would not like it to be the case though, the halfway house seems to be of the worst-of-both-worlds variety. See my comment here:. Brilliant insights as usual. I have very deep respect for what this community is doing.
All these projects will converge on a singular consensus-driven infrastructure. This is necessary and absolutely inescapable given current trends and the state of the world at this stage in our history. The only thing that will rally the support of the entire global community is the prospect of creating an incorruptible decentralized technological civilization with its own unique form of world citizenship.
This is not something reasonable people will disagree about, this is something we can all agree to and celebrate. If we all coordinate our efforts toward this common end we will positively shift the balance of power on this bitcoin garden not giving away eth for ages to come. The balance of power must shift for us to make progress as a species. Of course, this can only come to fruition if we build up critical mass with society at large.
What the people of this earth want and desperately need at this point is an extremely trustworthy and disinterested group of supporters who will back their collective interests with these emerging technologies.
This group would then use their influence to campaign for a collaborative model connecting these projects together in a persuasive package. This can only become truly persuasive if it employs an unconditional basic income for its citizens. It also needs to enable the general public to create their own decentralized communications, law, production, finance, and governance.
This is a human rights issue, not a point for internet trolls and corrupt individuals to disagree about. If those conditions are satisfied everything will go viral extremely quickly, and the entire world will become engaged, leading to profound collective intellingence and spontaneous self-organization. If we all invest ourselves with value, bitcoin garden not giving away eth will shift the perception of value.
Everyone mocked bitcoin in the early days too. Strange how things turned out, huh. The funny bit is how no one is making the connection between decentralization and bitcoin garden not giving away eth equality.
Fact is these technologies are quickly rendering the world banking system and governments obsolete. All you greedy investors with your fantasies of making a fortune off magic internet money are in for a big surprise. Will you force them for their own good? Go on and make them sorry. See how far you get when nobody trusts you. The reason BTC works is because it makes good an exactly what it is supposed to do: Create something value for yourself and for others. That is how you make the world better.
Just try to actually learn from it instead of spiraling deeper and more pathetic each time. It has nothing to do with me as an individual. It has nothing to do with violence bitcoin garden not giving away eth totalitarian dystopias. Truth is, absolute voluntarism is a contradiction.
Tell me something, who will enforce your principle on others? Because it is a principle, no different than mine. Clearly, if I can get more freedom for myself by bitcoin garden not giving away eth you into a situation that robs you of your time and precious energy, then all the better for me. Why should I care about what you want?
