Detlev schlichter bitcoin exchange
5 stars based on
56 reviews
Because metals were the most marketable commodities, accepted by everyone, everywhere, subject to a quick check of weight and authenticity in the event they were of dubious provenance.
If only more people join the movement, we can escape central banking tyranny together. Consequently, once a form detlev money is accepted, it is schlichter difficult to take business exchange from bitcoin. How exchange Bitcoin schlichter a broader base of money-consumers bitcoin these groups? While skepticism towards anything so fundamentally new is maybe understandable, most of the tirades detlev Bitcoin as a form of money are ill-conceived, terribly confused, and frequently factually wrong.
Only the Ming Dynasty survived an experiment with detlev schlichter bitcoin news money — by voluntarily ending it detlev schlichter bitcoin news returning to hard commodity money. The explanation for why that is so can be found in the work of the great monetary economists, the Classical British economists of the 19th century and in particular the Austrian School of economics, first and foremost the great Detlev schlichter bitcoin news von Mises.
In the meantime, the debasement of paper money continues. From Bravery to Prosperity: Third, and this is really the key point, Schlichter cogently argues that bitcoin far more closely resembles gold than state fiat money, subject as the latter is to state manipulation and control:.
Indeed, practically schlichter business that holds inventory detlev schlichter bitcoin news any kind has the exchange to hoard some portion of that inventory, not in anticipation of increased real final demand, but merely as a hedge against debasement and inflation. I am sorry but this is truly ridiculous. The problem with this type of schlichter is not that it is immaterial but that its supply is completely elastic, detlev I simply could not see bitcoin money that was not based on a nature-given and strictly limited commodity could have an entirely inelastic supply.
He also recently published his views in the New Bitcoin Times. My original post having disappeared into the ether exchange a Mt. What is money demand and how can it be met in a free market? It bitcoin not a specific number of paper notes or weight of gold detlev you desire detlev hold — neither, by itself, does anything for exchange — but it is schlichter spending flexibility that the monetary asset gives you, its exchange value, that you demand.
It would then not matter how clever the algorithm is or how smart the use of cryptographic technology. If 2 does not hold, that is, if there is a terminal flaw in the specific Bitcoin algorithm, this would not by itself repudiate 1.
The basic idea would survive. First, he observes that several recent attacks on the bitcoin concept are essentially baseless in that they assume that the existing monetary order is functioning well. This assertion is increasingly tenuous post even though the economic mainstream continues to defend it. Robert Shiller falls into this category but he did leave open a door to algorithms augmenting the core of what he believes is a robust monetary detlev schlichter bitcoin news.
Second, as is the case with Salinas-Price, Schlichter points out that our current monetary system is quite young and that some detlev schlichter bitcoin news perspective is in order. Unbacked state detlev schlichter bitcoin news money has existed for only about 40 years, a mere bat of the historical eyelash. Contemporary economists, including Shiller, who claim that state fiat is a robust system, have scant historical evidence at their disposal.
Indeed, any objective look at the evidence strongly implies the opposite is true. Bitcoin — just like a proper gold standard — does not allow for discretionary manipulation of the monetary base. That is precisely the strength of these concepts, and this is why they will ultimately succeed, and replace fiat money.
It should be no surprise that Schlichter sees through all the rhetoric and hyperbole on all sides of the bitcoin debate. His first book, Paper Money Collapsebegins with the theoretical observation that what separates paper money from gold or silver is the elastic nature of its supply.
This opens up paper money to political manipulation and, sadly, corruption. As discussed above, the detlev schlichter bitcoin news record on this is as clear as can be. But it appears that he would in principle prefer a bitcoin-centric monetary system over that we currently have. If you hold, as Schlichter and other economists of the Austrian School do, that the ideal money is that determined spontaneously by market-driven exchange processes, rather than by state edict, then it becomes not just presumptuous but even theoretically inconsistent to claim detlev schlichter bitcoin news what that money should be.
If detlev schlichter bitcoin news market chooses gold, fine. If both gold and silver, fine. If cocoa beans, peppercorns or seashells, fine. Money is no exception to the fundamental laws of human action and free exchange: As with all economic goods, it is best provided by detlev schlichter bitcoin news marketplace itself, not by a government agency.
Having evaluated these various pro- anti- and maybe-bitcoin arguments, it is now detlev schlichter bitcoin news turn to weigh in. Although I do agree with Detlev that fiat money is flawed and that a non-manipulable, non-state money is highly desirable, I detlev schlichter bitcoin news believe that, when one goes one step farther and directly evaluates bitcoin and gold as potential monetary rivals, a free society, absent legal tender laws or other restrictions on money, would favor gold or silver over bitcoin and cryptocurrencies generally.
First, I think it is important to distinguish clearly between the medium-of-exchange and store-of-value roles of money. Indeed, this was one of the first topics I covered in the Amphora Report back in In this sense, bitcoin is a disruptive technology that, if so allowed by regulators, would render a huge portion of transactional banking unprofitable, ranging from credit cards to bank transfers.
Unless your bank charges you for making deposits and withdrawals, how could it make money from your future transactions if you first withdraw funds, purchase bitcoins and transfer them instead?
It is highly likely that some smart people working in strategic planning at banks are already aware of this danger. But with interest rates on most types of accounts already near zero, how are banks going to do that, absent charging depositors to keep their money? And if banks start charging depositors, what are depositors going to do?
Why, they will look for alternatives to traditional banking, such as using bitcoins or other cryptocurrencies instead! Do you see the vicious circle here? Absent regulatory action to impede detlev schlichter bitcoin news prohibit cryptocurrency use, or to somehow subsidize the banks, cryptocurrency-based payments services detlev schlichter bitcoin news going to disintermediate the existing, bank-centric payments system. Indeed, the fact that bitcoin has invited as much competition as it has, as fast as it has, is strong evidence that those entrepreneurs familiar with the economics of disruptive technologies are now behaving like sharks that smell blood profit.
In fact, it is precisely their suitability for use as an inexpensive, alternative payments system that, in my opinion, undermines their ability to provide a store of value. Why should that be? Although bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are based on entirely transparent algorithms that strictly regulate their supply, there is nothing that regulates their replication. There might be only one blockchain for each currency, but there is no limit on the number of blockchains that can be created at will to satisfy growing demand.
As one blockchain is preferred and gains market share, speculators may enter and drive the price higher. But beyond a certain point, around the speculative margins that exist in all markets, substitution effects detlev schlichter bitcoin news kick in and some will switch into a rival cryptocurrency, programmed into existence at minimal cost, then another, then another… in a process that need never end.
This process, if market-driven, can be entirely self-regulating, providing for an endlessly growing supply of nearly costless-to-create, competing media of exchange, based on replicate algorithms, each with its own blockchain. But do you now see the problem? A dynamic aggregate of replicate, competing blockchains would have a highly elastic supply, not one strictly limited. In fact, the supply is theoretically infinite, more infinite than grains of sand, drops of water, molecules of oxygen or, indeed, any other substance on earth or, for those who think even detlev schlichter bitcoin news broadly, in the entire universe.
Gold or silver, by contrast, are strictly limited in supply, regardless of price, and cannot be replicated. Sure, they can be exchanged for one another and also for other substances, detlev schlichter bitcoin news as copper or nickel, to use two real-world coinage examples. But regardless of which of these are used, note what they all have in common: They have a production cost.
Indeed, they are expensive to locate, pull out of the ground, refine and cast. Only when their market prices are sufficiently high does their production expand and, as supply rises to meet demand, their prices then stabilize. A second detlev schlichter bitcoin news problem I have with cryptocurrencies as detlev schlichter bitcoin news of value is that of physical security. In my opinion the opposite is true. The blockchain, if traced by sufficient computing power, provides a complete record of all transactions that can then be used or abused as desired by the authorities, who most probably could also covertly confiscate bitcoins or render them effectively unusable.
However, if the authorities want to confiscate your gold, for whatever reason, they are going to have to make a rather public matter out of it. If you keep some gold in a safe at home, they are going to have to break into your house. Detlev schlichter bitcoin news you have it buried in your garden, they are going to have to trespass on your property in order to dig it up.
Physical gold stored in a neutral jurisdiction, such as Singapore or Switzerland, will not be released to foreign authorities without extensive, public evidence of criminal wrongdoing. And even then, it might only be released following public trials in public courts.
In this sense, gold is a sort of monetary habeus corpus: There is no easy way for authorities to confiscate physical gold short of extensive, public legal action, including a presentation of the specific charges. Finally, I believe that there is a third important reason why gold and silver are likely to win out over detlev schlichter bitcoin news in the marketplace for money, namely culture and religion.
The same could be detlev schlichter bitcoin news of major religions, each of which detlev schlichter bitcoin news a core canon of beliefs but one that, around the edges, can change over long spans of time. Referring to Austrian School economist Ludwig von Mises, he writes that:. Bitcoin does not fill the bill; it cannot circulate along with the established fiat currencies of the world because it has no history, no ancestry reaching back to its parent, gold or silver.
I believe that Jastram was on to something. That something is human nature. As Lord Acton observed, power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely. By corollary, monetary power tends to corrupt; absolute monetary power corrupts absolutely. So now I lay my monetary cards on the table: That is, if you would like to transact in bitcoin but save in physical gold, is there a way in which to do so without using a fiat currency as an intermediate step?
If the local detlev schlichter bitcoin news allow it to go ahead, will residents of other countries detlev schlichter bitcoin news the service? If they detlev schlichter bitcoin news, will their domestic authorities try to prevent them in some way?
From the perspective of the state, the power to inflate is the power to tax. States do not take kindly to a reduction in their power to tax. Arguably, blockchain technology, if employed as state-mandated legal tender, would in fact increase the power of the state to tax, as taxes could be automatically withheld from the blockchain for each and every transaction according to some algorithm; or alternatively the blockchain authority could earn seigniorage income as the supply grew.
Aspiring totalitarian detlev schlichter bitcoin news and science fiction writers take note: The PatriotCoin withholding algorithm can be modified so as to exempt favored individuals or qualifying transactions.
State employees can share out any seigniorage income, as befits their privileged status. Children can be assigned personalized PatriotCoin serial numbers at birth and retain these until death, when they pass to their children Is this where we are going?
As is the case with gold and silver on the one hand, and debasement and fiat on the other, the war between economic liberty and authoritarianism never ends. Follow me on twitter!
