Please turn JavaScript on and reload the page.
5 stars based on
80 reviews
Litecoin founder Charlie Lee underlined the potential value of crypto-currency in fighting government censorship today, wikileaks litecoin. No company or government can stop me. That's what makes crypto-currency valuable! This was in response to a tweet yesterday from Wikileaks founder Julian Assange talking about how crypto-currencies like Bitcoin and Litecoin help fund his organization. Many followers of Wikileaks, and alternative media in general, have been split over wikileaks litecoin emergence of crypto-currency, with theories circulating that Bitcoin may have even originated as a CIA operation.
But others find value in the decentralized nature of this emerging technology, while platforms like Steemit also highlight the value of blockchain technology in overcoming censorship in wikileaks litecoin increasingly centralized system.
Charlie Lee faced some criticism for his support of Wikileaks in his initial message after a re-tweet from Assange, but the Litecoin founder doubled down on his support of using crypto to back free speech, Charlie Lee [LTC] SatoshiLite. The number of people upset at me for donating to Wikileaks litecoin shows why censorship resistant is so wikileaks litecoin. If those people wikileaks litecoin, they would stop everyone from donating. The point is, it's my money and only I decide what I do with it.
A monetary statement, not political. While I do share a level of skepticism, I am hopeful that big players in the crypto community like Charlie Lee are strongly advocating for the values of free expression that we're seeing pushed out of the mainstream. What do you think about the potential of cryptocurrency for this purpose? If you think it's inconceivable that very simple means of disabling cryptos might be used should they threaten the immensely powerful and wealthy, just remember how many have died in WWI, WWII, the wars since, the Maoist cultural revolution, the Bolshevik revolution, and so on and so forth.
All they need to do is turn off your power, or firewall the internet. No more net neutrality to even make it illegal. Rather than wikileaks litecoin all of the possible things that might be wrong with cryptocurrencies, think about the dollars in your wikileaks litecoin and what they represent and then decide which you'd prefer to own. I couldn't agree more about wikileaks litecoin and fiat, yet firewalls and power outages won't prevent my fiat from use.
Even greater disruptions will be necessary to do that. I am not wikileaks litecoin cryptos, rather the fractional reserve banksters, and simply pointing out that cryptocurrency alone isn't sufficient to create wikileaks litecoin from their depradations. Litecoin founder Charlie Lee underlined the potential value of crypto-currency in fighting government censorship today, tweeting: Charlie Lee faced some criticism for his support of Wikileaks in his initial message after a re-tweet from Assange, but the Litecoin founder doubled down on his support of using crypto to back free speech, Charlie Lee [LTC] SatoshiLite The number of people upset at me for donating to WikiLeaks wikileaks litecoin why censorship resistant is so important.
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post. The world needs Cryptocurrencies. I wish I was confident they were secure from regulation, or other means of control. It is trivial to stop cryptos, if they become an actual threat. What has happened wikileaks litecoin Coinbase? Makes the Black Death in the middle ages seem like a walk in the park. Would wikileaks litecoin such steps be inconceivable in view of what is demonstrably history?
Don't count on it. Additional tools are required.