All about ledger accounts transactions
38 commentsOracle user blockchain capital one
Screenshot from Coindance showing BIP 91 has now locked in. The Bitcoin price has already surged based on the expected result. Anticipation of this happening seems to have already pushed the Bitcoin price up to new highs for this month. Well as I understand it after a further 2 days of blocks BIP 91 will activate - this is a grace period to give people time to change their software to signal for Segwit.
SegWit will activate roughly 2 activation periods 4 weeks after this. Thanks to cardboard for his infographic which clarifies this in an easy to read manner. Given the extremely positive reaction that there has been to the rising signalling of BIP 91 I think we will see a lot of people who were holding off on buying Bitcoin entering the market again.
As I have explained before the more money that flows into bitcoin, the larger the total supply available to altcoins becomes as well.
Not quite as previously discussed the next hurdle will come in roughly two months time after SegWit activation - so late October at the earliest when there is a planned doubling in Bitcoin block size as per the SegWit 2x plan. This will require an actual hard fork. Despite this we may see renewed fear and uncertainty at that point as the words "hard fork" tend to scare a lot of people in the bitcoin community.
Given how relatively smoothly this has gone it seems likely that may also end up causing less turmoil than expected in practice. Anyway it's quite late here and I will be going to bed shortly so may not be able to respond to all comments until tomorrow. Click here to read more! This was very helpful. I think there will be wonderful opportunities for trading in the next few months. Indeed, most actual bitcoin users want the UAHF to bigger blocks.
Check out this poll that can't be sybil attacked voting requires signing a bitcoin address: In this post I examine why the UAHF is probably going to cause a short squeeze on Bitcoin this weekend leading into next week. You can make money on this, but it will be risky. I have just upvoted your all post. Please follow me https: You just did it again.
I have therefore flagged your last post which also featured the same bot like comment in your own responses! Here's an outlook how it performed compared to the rest. I think it is good that it came to BIP It may be the best solution for the future. As most of the coins are so dependent on BTC, it will also be the right way for us all I hope.
Every Cryptocoin is only as valueable as the community behind it ;. That shouldn't be necessary now. Obviously the market loves Segwit coming to Bitcoin. The innovation floodgates will be open.
Don't be fooled by bankster propaganda, actual bitcoin users overwhelmingly prefer bigger blocks - NOT segwit: Bear in mind to vote in that poll you have to actually sign a bitcoin address you own. It can't be rigged by a sybil attack.
Regular Bitcoiners want big blocks? Maybe Bitcoin users who know next to nothing about what makesit truly valuable and disruptive would go that route. Big blocks are the darlings of those who want cheap short term fees at any cost Yeah, you're right, who would want lower fees and faster transaction times? Not at the cost of centralization I don't. You want fast transactions, use Visa. How will it centralize anything? It is the big block camp that aligns closely with the govt-corp agenda.
They want to track and tax it all with all transactions on a large trackable blockchain that requires very large computing platforms to manage. Do you think some individual freedom loving cypherpunks are going to have the resources or interest in running and developing for that future version of Bitcoin? The bigblock agenda hands that totally dystopian future to them [the statists on a friggin' silver platter!
Seriously, you are 1 ignorant and willfully so, or 2 a shill--and a probably paid one. I am leaning towards no. I would add 3 stupid, but nobody in the BItcoin space is that stupid. Private property itself was stolen during the enclosure acts, through force.
Once it was all collective property, now the workers must fight each other to work under the capitalist just to survive. Without guards nothing would keep capitalism in existence. Capitalism has never existed without a government, while we have hundreds of examples of communism and socialism. You lack fundamental understanding of anarchy and you disgust me.
Trade your money for Tether if you think bitcoin is going to crash and you want to buy some or sell your bitcoin for tether if you can't sell it on coinbase! Later you can sell you tether for bitcoin and cash that out. Tether is crypto coin that is fixed to the dollar price, so 1 tether is always one dollar. Instead of cashing out you bitcoins to dollar you could simply buy tether and stay in the crypto world without taking care of fees and taxes. Here's the latest interesting bit of reading about 'finex.
You can keep them in your wallet and they kinda work the same way. This is really good news, thanks for sharing it with us! I'm following you for a while now, and you explained this earlier this week, now it is "locked in", nice! But what about all the others, who are not supporting it? How does this work? So we can be sure August 1 will be a good day, filled with mainstream media attention and even more money coming in the cryotospace??
Starting in a couple days, miners will start orphaning blocks that aren't signaling for the original version of segwit bip Miners that intend to fork will still signal to avoid being orphaned, but will switch to bitcoin-abc client on Aug 1 to start mining bigger blocks. Either way, make sure you have your coins in a wallet where you'll be able to access BOTH coins in the event of a split. If that were true we would have had scaling already. We will see though. BitcoinCash fork already trading at numbers that put it over a billion market cap - and it hasn't even forked yet!
According to Coinbase, they will not be allowing customers access to any Bitcoin Cash. Note that locking in BIP 91 is not the same thing as locking in Segwit. Locking in BIP 91 amounts to miners saying, " blocks from now, we all promise to ignore non-Segwit-signalling blocks, and build a chain of Segwit-supporting blocks. Assuming that all the miners now supporting BIP 91 stick to the terms of that agreement, after a short, block grace period, they will begin mining, and mining on top of, Segwit-signalling blocks only.
This means that if there are still miners creating non-Segwit blocks, they will have limited hashpower, and consequently be building a much smaller chain than the Segwit-mining majority. Because the network accepts the longest blockchain as the valid one, these non-Segwit miners will be building an invalid chain, giving them a significant financial incentive to switch to the Segwit chain. Then, after another grace period, Segwit itself should activate, and will be usable on the network. This all assumes that these miners do what they've comitted to do.
If they break their word at some point, the situation sort of explodes in complexity, and a lot of what I've written above becomes invalid. To speak more directly to your question, the miners who do NOT support Segwit, as noted above, will be mining a minority chain, and subject to having their blocks rejected by the majority of the hashpower.
If miners and users prefer a chain without Segwit and presumably bigger blocks they will likely hard fork themselves away from the majority consensus rules, creating an altcoin. This prevents a lot of potential harmful interference between the two chains. Note that the "success" or "failure" of a lot of these initiatives, whether they be activation mechanisms, technologies, concensus rules, or altcoins, are subject to the support of both miners and users.
I mention this because we don't have a clear idea of where miner and user support really lands on a lot of these proposals. We know what they're saying, yes, but we don't know if they are being genuine in signalling their support, or if they'll change their minds. It's completely possible, for example, for users to support Segwit2x long enough to activate Segwit, and then not follow a 2 MB hard fork.
It's also possible for a fork of the Bitcoin software to start out with overwhelming miner support, and for that support to migrate away from that chain if there is insufficient use of that coin to maintain the value of that coin and thus, profitable mining. Thus far, both polls reflect the biases of the faction that created them among other biasing issues , making them minimally effective as real gauges of opinion. I'm not aware of any good indicators, but there are ideologues on either side who exhibit I'll say this diplomatically misleading optimism and confidence about how things "will" work out.
I advise you to interpret such claims with caution, even when they are represented as fact, and to do your own research, using a variety of sources and opinions.
This makes a lot of my questinsore so clearly answered! As I understand it those people won't get excluded anyway. It is not a hard fork. If someone is completely against it they can fork off their own chain but it won't be bitcoin. Big Blockers are forking off on Aug 1. If they take a significant amount of hashpower with them, they WILL be bitcoin since they will be the longest chain. I very much doubt that since the majority of hashpower is behind the Segwit 2 x whether you like it or not.
People are free to fork off if they want but it is basically irrelevant - if they had the kind of support that they need then we would have had scaling a long time ago.